On The Natural State Of Nature, Volumes 1-2 Abridged Version

So if there was ever going to be an actual TOE, theory of everything what would it really need to include?

By its definition it would need to explain what single force is the driving force behind all other forces as well as I think the single building block of everything that is, was, or will ever be.

It would need to explain wave particle duality, the collapsing wave function, superposition, quantum tunneling, and if possible, maybe even entanglement but I will admit, at face value that last one could be tricky.

It would need to explain the catalyst that caused the chain of cosmic events we have labeled our Big Bang, it would need to explain what came before it, and what will eventually become of our universe. It would have to provide a clear picture of the true nature of not only time and space but also mass and energy.

I also think it would need to explain both dark matter and dark energy and thus fill in the gaps in our true understanding of gravity and why the rate that our visible universe is expanding appears to be increasing. It should be able to provide a likely reason why gravity can warp both space and time and how gravity works at both the micro and macro scales.

It should be able to explain how life first forms on dead wet rocks and how the potential course of human evolution should be expected to proceed. In doing so if it can better explain how and why humans evolved into the dominant species on our planet then all the better.

Well I believe I have come across such a theory. Before you write me off as another Dunning-Krueger crackpot let me mention that I am a bipolar polymath with a genius level IQ and have studied cutting edge scientific theory across multiple disciplines for over forty years. Being able to control the manic side of being bipolar is a huge benefit to a high IQ polymath and long binges of deep mental processing have provided me a picture that I am certain I can relay to you both clearly and logically.

If you have just a few minutes to spare I would like to share with you the cliff notes further below.

If after review of the cliff notes you want to see the more detailed analysis with the current empirical evidence to support it then please visit our Facebook group @thenaturalstateofnature https://www.facebook.com/groups/naturalstateofnature/learning_content and if you want to really understand what caused our Big Bang and what came before it then check out our youtube playlist , On The Natural State Of Nature, Volume 1: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_zrKFt1ZzKv2Mc97A5hLC9N5HUyy5-o5 I welcome all constructive criticism. If you like what you read or see please consider joining our facebook group, subscribing to our youtube channel or even better supporting us on Patreon or GoFundMe. https://linktr.ee/thenaturalstateofnature/ . Live long and prosper and may the force be with you. 42

“On The Natural State Of Nature (Volumes 1-3), Cliff Notes Edition” Copyright 10/31/2021 DR JM NIPOK

Humankind has brought forth an immense collection of knowledge about so many different subjects that its mind boggling trying to understand it all and keep current with everything pertinent across multiple disciplines. Difficult but not unattainable to stay fairly close behind.

But this amalgamation of knowledge is different than a true collection of facts however. We have multiple paradigms each presenting a standard model and those standard models are amazingly accurate. Some of the smallest things we can measure we can actually predict with amazing accuracy.

So how is that such great scientific frameworks could still have so many holes and mysteries? If we examine this simple question, it may become evident how simple the actual answer really is.

All the different paradigms are really nothing more than houses of cards. We have a house of cards that defines all we know about subparticle physics and another house of cards the defines the gamut of our knowledge about astronomy and the universe.

Other houses of cards can dictate all we know about the diversity of life or how our non-elementary elements all behave together and even how energy moves and behaves. But all these different houses of cards share two truths among them.

The first truth is that every level can only be as sturdy as the sum of levels below it and no sturdier. Each level of a house of cards that is unstable (unproven) puts at risk all subsequent levels built upon it. But that does not mean a level that is replaced or strengthened will always cause the entire house of cards to topple.

Sometimes entire branches or wings could fall off when certain faulty levels are repaired or replaced. However, each time we reinforce any level through empirical evidence and predictability we in turn further stabilize all levels above.

The other truth is that all these different paradigms or house of cards must share a single foundation. It is the strength of that foundation that in turn determines the strength of each of the houses of cards’ individual foundations. Well suppose I was bold enough to declare that the shared foundation of most all the various disciplines of science was flawed.

That would be a bold statement indeed and once you stop laughing feel free to continue.

I propose at the core foundation of all disciplines is the question of whether or not time and space are infinite. What we have done so far (for the most part) is to consider an infinite Universe as speculative while we accept the premise of some type of bounded universe as common sense. Well I say that nothing can be further from the truth.

Common sense and logic dictate that in fact time and space must be infinite and trying to fathom any sort of finite boundary to time or space is what we should be calling speculative.

The problem has to do with our Earthcentricity. It was quite the blow to find out that our planet was not the center of the universe or even the center of our solar system but that is an undeniable fact.

Well so must we continue to shed the last shreds of our Earthcentricity and accept that our known universe is one of an infinite number of other pockets of relative spacetime massenergy but even harder to digest is the probability that our relative scale factor could in fact be one of an infinite number of scale factors that support the right conditions to produce a periodic table.

But here is the really crazy thing! If we begin to consider the possibility that maybe the Universe is in fact truly infinite and our entire visible universe is really nothing more than a point in time and a point in space something almost magical begins to happen.

Each and every one of the current mysteries of our houses of cards begin to fill in with simple classical explanations and that level gets stronger and those levels above them all benefit.

So join me on a journey into the science behind an infinite Universe where all you will need to see how clearly things actually fit together are the laws of physics we already understand well and just a little bit of theoretical extrapolation.

All we need are the classical and relativistic laws of physics we already understand to explain quantum weirdness, wave particle duality, our big bang, dark energy, and even things like the harmonic galactic inclinations of distant galaxies and the missing black hole(s) that we know were once at the center of certain galaxies, virtual particles and zero point vacuum energy. Even dark matter and the nature of gravity all begin to make sense once we just accept the premise that our Universe is truly infinite and then try to visualize what the implications of that truth would mean.

So let us start with the implications of an infinite Universe first on the macro scale. How would our understanding of cosmology and astronomy change if we in fact were part of an infinite Universe?

Well to understand that we first must understand what our universe really is. What is the true nature of space and time?

If both are infinite, then there can be no largest measure or smallest measure of either space or time and all we can hope to ever measure regarding space or time are those measurements relative to the scientific precision of the instruments used to record those measurements and the scale factor of the relative measurements being taken.

An infinite amount of space and time would be impossible to only contain mass and energy in our one localized region so accepting infinite time and infinite space means also accepting infinite mass and infinite energy. Infinite amounts of time and space and mass and energy each with no largest measurement or smallest measurement. All we have are those measurements relative to our scale factor that have some meaning or value to us. There is infinitely more of the Universe we can never see compared to the speck of cosmic dust that we can see.

Well using what we already know about what we can see there is ZERO reason not to accept that this group of infinities most likely exists as discreet pockets of mass energy playing follow the leader. The most massive and dense objects over time cause those bodies sharing the same relative trajectory and relative velocity to share a frame of reference. Each of these relative cohesive frames of reference exist as a pocket of relative Minkowski spacetime.

All objects sharing the same relative speed and relative trajectory perceive the passage of both time and space at the same base level. This frame of reference itself is also in motion (ALWAYS) and the cohesive frame of reference or the pocket of relative spacetime massenergy all share a base perception of time and space.

Inside that parent pocket or frame of reference bodies can have their own speeds and trajectories and be subjected to a variety of gravitational attractions from siblings all sharing that same parent frame of reference. They are not limited to only those attractions but those tend to be the ones that exert the most influence.

This holds true for our solar system and our galaxy our cluster and our supercluster. And it also holds true for our visible universe. Each parent frame of reference passes on a base rate of perception as to the passage of space and time to all its children and those children in turn can all have different perceptions of time and space themselves that they in turn pass onto their children.

That means that our visible universe could likely have siblings and a parent frame of reference, and that parent frame of reference likely usually has siblings but will always have a parent. The nature of space and time and mass and energy is that inside an infinite Universe there would be an infinite succession of parent pockets of relative spacetime massenergy.

The implication of this almost certain fact, should it be true, not only explains what came before our big bang but also what caused our big bang. It is a mistake not to accept that an infinite span of time preceded our big bang and an infinite span of time shall pass after the last footprints we ever existed had faded away.

Relative to our sun we have a certain relative velocity however relative to the center of the milky way that relative velocity grows significantly. Relative to the center of our super cluster taking into account the motion of the milky way our relative speed increases even further.

So then if we live inside a succession of nested pockets of space time mass energy then each parent frame of reference would see us usually increase our relative velocity. Not always but as you continue to go up the amount of the relative increase likely diminishes over time but is always present!

That means that if we continued up the chain of parent frames of reference, we would eventually find one where our relative speed approaches the speed of light. Relative to a parent frame of reference that is hundreds of thousands if not maybe millions of nested levels deep it could see our relative speed actually approach the speed of light.

I propose there are times where pockets of relative spacetime massenergy of all different sizes and densities and scale factors collide and an infinite number of collisions between such pockets had already occurred before the one that formed our visible universe.

When we examine what might happen if two parent frames of reference that collided were sufficiently separated from our scale factors and when their paths intersect, we would have so many collisions of so many different pockets and when two pockets of our relative scale factor and make up pass through each other each moving at relative speeds that could approach 2C then all the problems of current cosmology fade away.

If two dense galactic centers collided at relative speeds faster than the speed of light, we would predict immense amounts of heat and energy would be released just like the heat and energy we know must have predated the CMB.

Then we would not need an unexplainable starting temperature of 10^35K and 380,000 years of cooling (that came after a brief period of faster than light movement of mass) if we got rid of the silly concept of all the matter of our known universe starting off inside a tiny condensed space.

The collisions of two pockets would have specific situations that would be predicted. These same predictions made by SCT (Successive Collision Theory) are not explained well if at all by our current Lambda-CDM model. So lets review all the different observational evidence that our current model struggles with that is actually predicted by SCT.

Most objects would speed right by each other igniting nebula and burning off atmospheres from planets but based on the density of the areas of the pockets that directly intersect we could have millions if not billions of collisions.

The angles of impact of a large number of the collisions that do occur would be predicted to have a majority of them with similar resulting angular momentum of the hot plasma quark gluon eddies of energy that wisped away and cooled to form rotating galactic accretion disks of all different sizes. This would result in a shared harmonic galactic inclinations and axis of rotations of many galaxies from disparate areas of the visible universe.

So many quasars also share similar axis of rotations and if we started out as a hot spinning ball of energy from inside a tiny condensed space then it becomes very difficult to explain why this relative harmonic inclinations and axis of rotations is also met with so much other diversity amongst the cosmos.

We would predict some collisions would occur almost head on and others would hit on the left, right, top, or bottom of the two colliding bodies. So, we would predict the distribution of galactic rotations to be somewhat evenly distributed between clockwise and counterclockwise rotations. Another prediction that perplexes the current model.

Because the relative speed of impact would be very close across all the different collisions, we would predict the resulting angular momentum of a very large number of galaxies of all different sizes and locations to all have similar rotational speeds. Again, perplexes the current model but predicted by SCT.

But the real proof may lie in those collisions that do not graze each other and decimate into hot spinning eddies of plasma energy but instead hit head on. 2 Massive objects could be two massive black holes hitting head on at relativistic speeds of 1.95C or even 1.8C would pulverize all matter into energy but without the resulting conversion of kinetic energy into angular momentum.

Instead, we have a conversion into heat and energy that can coalesce as it cools to create more mass than the starting masses of the objects that collided. We see this same behavior in how the mass of quarks alone is not sufficient to define the mass of protons or neutrons.

When those head on collisions happened, we would expect to see vast superstructures with lower if not unmeasurable rotational spins and because space is so vast we would expect to find large voids nearly empty of galaxies. Again, predictions of SCT that our current paradigm struggles with.

Lastly, if there were other pockets of relative spacetime massenergy besides ours existing inside separate parent frames of reference as I predict then occasionally celestial bodies could be ejected from their pockets and traverse vast distances to cross paths with ours. The relative speed of those objects would be based on how far removed their parent frame of reference is from ours. At some point they share a common parent pocket of relative spacetime massenergy and the farther that shared parent is the faster the relative speed between two objects at our scale factor could become.

When that happens the energy release could decimate a massive galactic black hole or cause stars to disappear. In each instance of my examples above between what SCT predicts and what the current paradigm does not did I forget to mention all these predictions have been observed?

If not then now I did so I close the discussion of what caused the big bang with something called red transients. Also tracked by the VASCO project, unlike the many unexplained objects that have disappeared, it seems we also had an instance of many new objects existing for a short period of time. If a FFTLO (foreign faster than light object) crossed through our universe and passed through a nebula we would predict hundreds or thousands of bright burning pockets that would be ignited by the heat of the object passing through that die out some time later and this prediction has also been observed but as of yet remains unexplained by other means.

So now we know what caused the big bang and what came before the big bang. Let’s take that a step further. If two larger pockets collided, then it’s almost guaranteed that there would be vast distances between groups of collisions and other pockets of relative spacetime massenergy besides our visible universe would have been created during the same event that created us.

So, our known universe likely has a rate of rotation and approximate axis of rotation and approximate size, approximate center of mass and center of gravity, average luminosity, average temperature, and very likely its own magnetic field and possibly creating an electric field inside its parent or grandparent pocket as it hurls and spins through spacetime.

All these properties would also be shared by our likely hundreds if not thousands of siblings sharing the same parent frame of reference as us, all playing follow the leader.

For it is the natural state of nature for bodies within a cohesive frame of reference to attract to the most massive collections of bodies and so the speed and trajectory of the most massive collections will in turn drive the approximate relative speed and relative velocity of all the less massive siblings sharing that same pocket.

Our entire known universe may be in orbit and/or we may have satellites and/or we may be on a collision course with another sibling inside our parent frame of reference. That parent frame of reference also likely has siblings, and it has the same features I just prescribed to our universe. The same could be said for any galaxy or planetary system where orbits and satellites exist at all different scales.

So, we know that mass and energy can bind to spacetime and impact how spacetime dilates and curves and warps. We can also see how those areas where there is sufficient localized gravitational attraction that the natural expansion of space and time can be abated.

In the areas of lower gravitational attraction, we see dark energy take over and the universe expands at what appears may be an increasing rate. Here we have a prediction from my theory of “ Nested Posts” (Pockets Of relative SpaceTime massenergy) .

If a parent post provides its perception of space and time to all its children bodies and then their relative speeds and the gravitational forces acting upon them as they hurl through space and time further define the perception of space and time they in turn pass onto their children then what we call dark energy is actually the dissipating tensor mesh strength of successive parent pockets.

So what is each pocket’s tensor mesh strength you must be asking. Good question!

All objects emit waves of energy in all directions until those waves are intercepted. The waves diminish over distance as the energy carried by the waves’ amplitudes is converted over time to create each additional wavelength extending outwards in a sphere. All waves naturally desire to move in spheres through Minkowski spacetime but can be restricted by the limitations of their medium. It is the relative friction of the waves’ movements through that medium that determines how much energy needs to transfer from the amplitude into the next wavelength.

I propose there was a second biggest blunder of science now that we have already fixed the shared foundations of all our houses of cards to accept the starting premise of an infinite universe. The next mistake I feel we made was another blind assumption much like the first.

Just like the starting premise of an infinite universe had previously been considered speculation instead of the other way around we now must also accept the fact (or least consider the likelihood) that it was wrong to propose or accept the possibility could exist for any type of wave to exist that does not require a medium.

All we know of waves and wave mechanics explain how energy moves yet because we tried to hold onto our Earthcentricity just a little bit longer we decided there could be waves that require no medium.

That was only because we could not yet detect the subquantum foam that permeates all of space and time. But evidence is now mounting that energy exists even inside vacuums and virtual particles pop in and out of existence as needed to help Feynman diagrams explain how energy and mass at subatomic scales can move and react through space and time.

The basic building block of all there is , was , or will ever be is the wave. The movement of energy that can in turn manifest as mass when it moves slow enough. And thus the basic force that drives all other forces is in fact the desire of nature to return to equilibrium. Waves displace their medium from its natural state and that natural state is equilibrium and nature strives to return to that state and we will find someday that all forces boil down to this basic force.

But I digress. Every object emanates waves of energy in the form of light, heat, magnetism, electricity, gravitation, and even energy. Those spherical waves all travel a certain relative distance from the object or collective body of objects based on the friction encountered traversing that wave’s medium.

So as it relates only to the waves of gravity that emanate from every object and in turn cause a warping of both space and time, if we were to provide a visual map of our solar system, the number of different intersecting spherical waves of gravity would be huge. If we could use light to represent the strength of the warping or binding to spacetime due to gravity caused by mass (and possibly high energy) then where those intersections occurred the light would be brighter.

Where larger more massive objects exist the light emanating outwards in all directions would be brighter. Even in areas of low gravitational attraction there would still be waves of faint light and where they intersect the light would be stronger.

So I propose those areas of the brightest “light” deep in space can in turn aggregate the warping of spacetime due to gravity. That binds those areas and I feel that time dilation will be proven to be stronger in those areas we determine should have the highest concentration of gravitational waves. We may even find additional gravitational attraction being caused by those areas and may be a small part of what we call dark matter.

So this mesh of gravitational attraction that would also exist inside every galaxy and every cluster would have a finite (relative to us) number of points even if they would be uncountable. Each point in spacetime could carry with it a measured direction and strength of multiple gravitational waves and thus we wave a tensor mesh of gravity that binds all pockets of spacetime massenergy together.

Each planetary system and each galaxy and each cluster and super cluster and our entire universe and all its siblings inside our parent and that parent pocket’s siblings and so on and so on all develop or evolve their own dynamic ever-changing tensor meshes of spacetime.

I now propose my first law. I propose the law of unbounded relative infinities. This states that no bounded collection of spacetime could contain an infinite amount of relative mass or relative energy or relative space or relative time no matter how much it is dilated. That means we can not only have densities of mass and energy but also densities of time and space.

But within any bounded region even though there may be an infinite succession of nested pockets inwards there is a point based on the degrees of our scientific precision that place a limit on what scale factors of pockets we can measure and thus are relative to us.

By the way, in case you did not figure it out yet, our planet is also a pocket of spacetime and further defines each of our unique perceptions of space and time and so is every plane, train, and automobile. But so is every one of us. Every one of us is a pocket of relative spacetime massenergy to the trillions upon trillions of microbes that live on each of us as well all our cells and indirectly their atoms.

This theory also states there is no such thing as a point singularity. You can not put infinite mass into a bounded space and that is why black holes grow in size. They do not contain a literal infinite singularity but instead become an as of yet unknown state of matter where the empty space inside quarks and leptons likely breaks down.

But again I digress. Every orbit is bounded space and every orbit requires some amount of energy to continue and every orbit slowly dissipates energy overtime due to friction. Without an infinite supply of energy inside a bounded space, every orbit will degrade and no orbit is free from this eventual death. There may be instances where orbits first degrade inwards, cause collisions, and new orbits form, but as time goes on those smaller orbits will all eventually decay.

So as we loose mass and we loose energy and the distances between planets and their home stars or between galactic centers and their child systems all diminish over time what we have is a dissipating strength of our tensor mesh.

When we recognize that our spacetime is provided by each parent frame of reference and their tensor mesh strength that binds mass energy to their relative spacetime dissipates then each child would see its spacetime literally being torn apart and that is exactly what we see happening.

There is a constant battle between the tensor mesh strength of every pocket of spacetime and all of its parent pockets and their dissipating tensor mesh strengths. So the final extension of the law of unbounded infinities also means that inside every orbit is a finite amount of relative time and space and mass and energy but the opposite holds true for that very same orbit.

There is an infinite amount of relative energy and relative time and relative mass and relative energy outside that bounded orbit. So this battle being fought between tensor mesh strengths is a losing battle for every child because their parent, grandparent, and great grandparent pockets of spacetime and their ancestors will win every time eventually.

If this was in fact the real cause for dark energy then not only would spacetime be expanding inside our universe but obviously outside as well and as it expands and grows weaker it loses its battle with its parent and as its parent tensor mesh grows weaker it becomes harder to fight off the dissipation of its parent. That would mean that we would predict the rate at which time and space expands in the areas inside our visible universe to have two properties.

First is that the rate would be predicted to increase as the succession of parent tensor meshes all dissipate and second that it would be variable not constant within out known universe. Again we find predictions matching observations that are current unknowns inside a paradigm that does not start with the premise of true infinity. But when we see the true nature of space and time and the true natural state of nature at face value then all the mysteries keep coming together.

OK, Big bang, check. Nature of space and time, check. Dark energy check. So lets touch on gravity for a bit. Let’s say there was a succession of nested pockets of space time and thus smaller particles than we can even perceive that in turn make up the particles we do see. A sea of quantum foam likely hundreds of times denser than our neutrino rivers.

Energy moving along this quantum foam in waves could be moving at least as fast as photons travel and it is when energy slows down below the speed of light and is in someway contained that we can then measure it as mass. Speaking of mass, there is a partial derivation for mass based on the frequency of energy in motion found on our website, TheNaturalStateOfNature.org . It needs someone with more time than me to isolate mass on the left hand side and I welcome any math gurus to offer up a solution.

So this subquantum foam has a property we have measured called the Casmir effect and when we apply friction and velocity as components of that effect I am certain we will be able to derive a way to arrive at some type of electrostatic charge. I have not yet found the math and that could be because we have no idea what the properties of the subquantum foam are but the attraction between subquantum foam that in turn causes the binding to spacetime is an electrostatic charge. It is in turn the aggregate combined electrostatic charges of all the quantum foam involved in each object’s sphere of gravity that in turn causes the gravitational effects we feel. That is why they share the same equation and why the search for quantum gravity is a futile effort.

But there are other properties of gravity that make up the rest of the dark matter. Some may equate to the quantum foam and as it pertains to the aggregation of energy at the “brightest” spots of a tensor mesh strength but also as it relates to the aggregated properties of posts.

When we have a pocket then all child objects share a similar relative trajectory and velocity and so their emanating waves are able to aggregate in phase and when waves of energy aggregate in phase that increases the amplitude of the wave but when that happens the amount of energy carried by the wave does not increase linearly but exponentially so multiple objects inside a pocket all emanative waves in phase will make the total aggregate energy of those waves stronger than they would have been as separate components. A simple test would be to put 10,000 bright LED flashlight together and turn them on a few at a time and measure their strength from far away. A faint light would grow to be much brighter.

Well I say the same thing happens to gravity moving in waves that in turn warp space and time. When multiple bodies share the same trajectory and velocity and their gravitational waves aggregate in phase then the resultant total gravitational attraction is greater than the sum of its parts and that is the second thing that makes up dark matter but there is one more piece of the puzzle that is needed to complete our understanding of gravity. (OK two more)…

The first is something I coined long ago, Aetheric Density. We never found the aether (A) because it is too small to be detected even by the best magnifications we can achieve and (B) because the aether is in fact everything. All objects contribute to the strength of gravity between two objects. We can not calculate gravity using a formula and a constant.

And the second is that in order to properly calculate gravity you need a function not a formula and a variable not a constant. And a ton of parameters. Far too many parameters to properly calculate the force of gravity so we estimate. But let us say we go into the center of the largest supervoid in the universe where no other matter has any direct bearing and the tensor mesh strength would be unmeasurable. We put 2 objects 100 meters apart and over time they will attract to each other if they were placed parallel to the direction the void is moving they would collide. The degree of deviation from inside that trajectory of the parent frame would define the type of orbit that would instead be created.

For the purposes of this visualization we will put the objects parallel to the direction the parent frame is moving so the objects collide. One is moving towards the other already and one is moving against the flow so even though the strength of the gravitational attraction may be the same, the rate they move towards each other can vary marginally. Now let’s add an object equal to the mass of the other two and place it in the center.

Now not only are both original objects pulling on each other but they also pull on this mass placed in the center and that aggregate pull by both of them on the new object will cause a total increase in the gravitational strength each object feels and when there are multiple objects between the two of them there is a greater aggregate tugging on space time to warp and so the objects at both ends could be looking at a marginally deeper gravity wells along the way than if the objects were solitary.

That could come into play when we examine how objects within an atmosphere are subjected to much stronger forces than outside that atmosphere. Now most the issue is that objects want to continue moving in orbit and the increased friction of the atmosphere causes the orbit to degrade rapidly into more direct and less angular free fall however I am still certain that the density of the objects between two objects will cause an increase in the total aggregate attraction. That is why I feel once objects enter our atmosphere the forces of gravity become much much stronger than what we see for objects orbiting around our planet outside of the atmosphere.

So dark matter is a combination of the mass of the quantum foam that we can not directly detect yet but is still present, our lack of understanding how waves in phase for a single pocket will produce stronger aggregate waves, how aetheric density causes a stronger total aggregate warping of space time, and how we need to use a function not a formula to calculate an exact force of gravity under all circumstances.

If these theories were correct, then we would expect a warping of space time thus a lensing effect to occur in areas where we see no visible mass. The unexplained observations from inside the Bullet cluster would seem to back up this prediction. It is not dark matter we see inside the Bullet Cluster, it is the way that the strongest areas of tensor mesh strength would incur the most dramatic impacts of the warping of space and time and thus able to bend light where there is no visible mass present.

So lets look at waves of energy inside a quantum foam. It would be predicted they would be even more chaotic in nature than electron clouds. So if there was a layer of particles and energy far below that we can currently measure and energy moving in waves inside this medium when slowed down enough and in some way constrained would produce visible mass instead of energy and when not slowed down to observe it and allowed to continue along following its own wave function we would expect there to be interactions inside the quantum foam that would impact how the medium moves.

Just like one ripple in a pond can be distorted when a second rock is thrown or when it hits a protruding tree, so will intersecting waves of energy as well as free quantum foam be subjected to the same laws of physics we already understand. Besides the electrostatic attraction carried by waves of gravity the waves of energy that make up particles could be impacted by electromagnetic forces that can either attract or repel.

So what would be the implications of these subquantum attractions and repulsions that we can’t even measure. It means that it would predict our best possible understanding of the quantum realm would be limited to probabilities not predictabilities because we have no way to measure or gauge the diverse subquantum interactions occurring at layers far below what we can measure.

But that is how spherical waves of energy representing particles could sometimes appear to be in two different places and how waves would behave when passing through two slits and how a quantum object that is made up of subquantum foam could sometimes appear to pass between barriers that they otherwise would not be able to cross.

Wow that is a lot to digest. Big bang explained alongside feasible explanations for both dark energy and dark matter. If you like what you read so far and it interests you please consider joining our facebook group , subscribing to our youtube channel , or even sponsoring us at our Patreon or GoFundMe sites.

An infinite multiverse most certainly exists but not one that has 11 or 12 dimensions. Those uses of the word dimension as well as alternate dimensions and parallel dimensions are all too often thrown around loosely and interchangeably. Our Facebook group, in the guides section, where you can see much of this current work evolve has a really good in depth look into what alternate realties and parallel universes actually are if you are interested. But often the use of the word dimension is thrown around haphazardly. I think string theory is a perfect example of the misuse of dimensions.

We expand from one dimension to the next dimension by following a very simple rule. We must intersect an existing dimension with a line of measurement in order to create a dimension. Very simple. And we must be able to show an object from the lower dimension on at least 2 or more points along this new line of measurement or else that object becomes indistinguishable from its lower dimensional self. But when we can record or measure or predict how an object will traverse that new line and take a relative measurement, we can then say that object exists inside that next higher dimension.

4D Minkowski spacetime is the framework that all pockets coexist inside of but our understanding of those 4 dimensions is incorrect. We say a point can not really exist in time or space but the reality is that every point is actually a relative point. There is a point where we lose all relative ability to make any measurements at a certain scale factor and can only measure to a smaller and smaller precision as the technology to do so improves.

If a point did not truly exist in time and space then I say that all we can see and touch could never be seen or felt. It is because those points are only points “up until a point” before they in turn become relative in a measurable dimension that I feel time is not the fourth dimension. For even a zero dimensional point, in order to become a one dimensional object, that point or measurement must be time. For nothing can ever exist if it does not first traverse the line of time. Time is the first dimension, not the fourth dimension.

EVERY object and every cohesive frame of reference acquire their own unique line of time from their current succession of parent pockets of spacetime. So I feel time is the first dimension. Then we have the three spatial dimensions of length and width and height but I think it is incorrect to stop there with just measurable dimensions of existence. I theorize that our subquantum foam has both mass and energy and they are not only interchangeable but intertwined just like space and time are.

EM radiation rides waves of subquantum energy that are able to produce a single photon as a discreet chunk of measurable energy and subatomic particles ride waves of quantum subparticles. So with both mass and energy being infinitely large and infinitely divisible I feel that what we call the quantum fields of QFT that define our standard elementary particles is not 24 separate fields but a single field of energy. It is in fact our fifth dimension. Energy is the fifth dimension and once we begin to understand the true nature of space and time and how energy binds to space and time I think we may be on the verge of entirely new branches of electrodynamics.

But where energy goes mass always follows and so I feel that 4D Minkowski spacetime in fact intersects the plane of massenergy to produce the core six dimensions of existence. If we follow this logic then luminosity and temperature round out the complete set of the 8 dimensions that every object can be said to exist as. Not 11, not 12, not 4, but 8 dimensions that we can use to define every facet of every object and every interactions between those objects.

What would we predict if inside each atom far below plank scales millions of nested levels deep there existed another atomic scale? We might predict that both matter and energy manifest and behave certain ways based on the specific parameters of the density of mass, the density of energy, the density of time, and the density of space.

When we discussed pockets of space time so massive that the relative velocity of our solar system when examined from that parent frame of reference many times removed began to approach the speed of light it would make sense that barrier precludes the jump to the next largest atomic layer.

And as the density of time and space have to deal with the relative velocity of energy and mass and their densities then it would be predicted that our nested succession of parent pockets of relative spacetime massenergy (posts) would experience some type of repetition as to how mass and energy manifest themselves at relative scale factors under similar conditions. We may expect a procession of tables just like our standard model and periodic table that continues downwards and thus upwards where relative to the parent frame of reference we would see specific types of discreet groupings of massenergy density.

They can then in turn be categorized by their properties and behaviors and how they interact together at that scale factor and how the laws of physics we already understand as it relates to electromagnetism, gravity, thermodynamics, inertia, and pressure would dictate how the matter behaves as well as how it evolves into the next largest “table” of bodies.

There may be some pockets that have all the steps and there can be many pockets where certain levels or steps are skipped completely because of insufficient mass density or energy density or maybe even spacetime density so there will always be minor exceptions and variations but at certain relative scale factors and degree of precision at that scale factor those exceptions could be unmeasurable. If we then accept the potential for an infinite succession of parent frames of reference and thus an infinite succession of child frames of references then it would make logical sense that the barrier created by the speed of light could be the number of nested levels deep between atomic layers. But how could we ever possibly prove such a crazy fantasy? Surely there is never going to be a way to prove this?

Maybe there is. I would like to wrap up by giving you something to ponder that might actually hurt your brain while you try to comprehend it. The intent is not to cause harm and so I apologize up front for any migraines or hangovers this last topic might induce. These “cliff notes” are really a very shortened version of my essay, On The Natural State Of Nature ( #thenaturalstateofnature ) and the facebook group and youtube channel offer hopefully ample observational evidence to help support my contention that we in fact live in an infinite universe and the implications of this fact help fill in many of the gaps inside our current standard paradigms. May the houses of cards we have built end up stronger in the end either by final proof or final disproof of my theories.

So I leave you with a parting thought that again, I am sorry that this is going to really mess with your head. Evolution does not just cease without a reason. As technology expands and we are able to set up systems on all the moons and asteroids and planet(s) that can use fission reactors for clean energy to power full indoor hydroponic based atmospheres full of both plant and animal life working within a very ordered and planned management-of-all-resources type approach we could outlive the end of our sun. I just saw last week a great idea that 3 million years from now long before our sun starts to grow we could work out the technology to add thrusters to our planet and actually slowly move into increasing orbits for as long as needed. The types of shields and protections needed to keep our atmosphere together and keep out as many as the harmful cosmic rays as possible could allow our planet to continue.

If we don’t change our ways and begin to work towards global Ubuntu our species and many others are all surely doomed. Only by cooperation at a global scale for the benefit of every living creature sharing this single rock hurling through space can we work out how to fully optimize every facet of resource management for the continued survival of our species. But let us say it works and we finally stop all war and racism, prejudice, and even nationalism begins to fade away into history.

We invest our time and resources to advancing technology so we can try to someday move past the limits of our solar system and begin to venture out in all directions into the vast cosmos to help spread the seed of our species across our galaxy. Now suppose by some miracle we evolve not just for another 5 billion years but we were one of the rare and lucky species to evolve for say a hundred trillion years or even a quintillion years. We could have reached the farthest outskirts of our visible universe and be able to peer out into the vast expanse that separates us from all our other siblings created during the same intersecting parent pockets that created us.

If we have a sufficient number of other siblings that are visible and we could over time aggregate that data for centralized collection and analysis, using parallax we could determine our approximate rate of rotation, axis of rotation, and possibly even our orbital period.

This is a monumental task that such a tiny tiny fraction of all sentient species ever reaches but with an infinite Universe there will be some pockets of space time where civilizations evolve for octillions or nonillions of years and when they do it would be predicted that they would establish large arrays for both reception and transmission all along vast areas of their outermost pocket’s boundary. It is logical to assume some large number of advanced civilizations would try to reach out into their vast expanses and try to communicate.

So then since as I proposed we assume that waves that share the same trajectory and velocity can aggregate to carry energy further and stronger then I predict that we could have tiny pockets that are millions of nested levels deep below plank scale yet still able to produce a signal that could break through plank scale and be relative to us or measurable by us.

The length of time it might take for a species to evolve to the point to build such an array would vary widely because pockets would come in all different sizes and densities. We have no idea if we are average or big or small or dense or cooler than most other pockets at our scale factor and there could be some that are smaller where it could be feasible to have vast arrays built along the outskirts of their Post in billions not trillions of years.

And with those vast arrays able to produce an aggregate sound if my theory that our atomic layer repeats and another periodic table exists at a spacetime density far below out plank scale then we should be able to hear a small portion of those signals. But with millions of atoms involved inside the inner ear even only a small percentage of them reaching us should still be a constant symphony.

People have different levels of hearing and some have much more sensitive levels then others. Some could hear different strengths of the tones but I predict based on the number of atoms involved there would be a non-stop never ending sequence of tones and frequencies that would be very high pitched most times. Most would be short and average decibel range but occasionally there would be much louder and longer lasting bursts of high pitched sounds.

This is predicted by my theories and is called Tinnitus. But this is not something that only people who suffer from Tinnitus can hear. In fact almost every one of us if left in a very quiet place and try hard to listen very closely to the symphonies you all hear coming from inside your ears (maybe) and agree it never ceases. If this was an external sound then the long bursts that are loud would be heard in both ears at the same time but they are not. Two different symphonies playing inside the inner depths of each eardrum. We invest so much trying to hear proof of aliens out in space and our proof has been here all along. Not saying we could ever decode or decipher those messages. They were not meant for us and we could never develop the precision to break them down but I bet we someday confirm repeating patterns. That random nature of repeating patterns over time should be the proof these are created by sentient species.

I now must also apologize to all the people that had Tinnitus all this time but were able to mentally drown out the noise and push it to the background and ignore it all the time and now you will have a much harder time trying to drown out the noise that I made you aware of and for this I do humbly apologize. Thinking that each separate tone could be alien communications really blows the mind but being a prediction of an infinite multiverse and being observed seems like maybe more than just a coincidence.

Before we waste another penny trying to smash universes together at high speeds we should put a couple years into fine tuning the magnification of sounds from the tiniest of possible precisions but without all the added noise and static cancelling functions that we use in microphones. Raw unabated microscopic sounds if we can record then maybe someday if we can record in small enough packets of data we could confirm different repeating patterns which I also predict. But at our relative scale factor I am sure the ability to detect those subtly repetitions and thus hopefully rule out random chaos in our ears but forethought put into some type of message. A message that we will never have the precision to decode but alien contact none the less.

I really hope you enjoyed reading this as much as I enjoyed writing this. So this condensed cliff notes covers most of volumes 1, 2, 3 of my essay On The Natural State Of Nature and if I piqued your interest then please join my facebook group and subscribe to my youtube channel and help me spread the word. That word is infinite. Say it loud say it proud, there is no bottom turtle! Live long and prosper. May the force be with you. 42. Volume 2 as a you tube playlist is in the works and I think volume 1 does a pretty fair job at providing a clear explanation of time and space and the nature of our universe and the cause of our big bang and I welcome all constructive criticism.

#successivecollisiontheory, #thebigbang, #multiverse, #infiniteuniverse

For Even More Details And Links to the Observational Evidence Check Out Our Home Page

#thenaturalstateofnature

LIVE LONG AND PROSPER
MAY THE FORCE BE WITH YOU

SAY IT LOUD, SAY IT PROUD
THERE IS NO BOTTOM TURTLE.

All the darkness in the entire vast multiverse can not defeat the flame of a single candle.

42


DR JM NIPOK